| Remember kids stealing cars is not a legit business. |
I also remember putting some time and thought process into its direction but I always ended up at a dead end. It's a simple thought but I can't really get my mind around it easily. Money and its importance have been incorporated in our lives ever since we cried out of our mommy's womb. Even at that point where we didn't even know about ourselves yet, we already cost money. Now just imagine that your parents would just be given a free service. When they'd come into a drug store, people there would just hand them the diapers and baby stuff because they got a baby and are entitled to those things. Just like that. No one would ask anything and everyone would have what they need.
Or when you'd go to the grocery store. You usually go there because you need food. You need food because you're hungry and that food would simply be given to you. No one would ask for anything in return and you'd have your food. No need for money. Well, it wouldn't be called a store in that case. No idea what would it be called. Food palace? The more I think about it, more complicated it gets because we're in a system that's been around for so long, we can't even imagine how it would be if everyone just had thing.
There's plenty of resources and enough for everyone. For now at least, thing's are going downhill as we speak. The idea of everyone having something and no one being without anything sounds obscure at it is. Like an ideal world, or at least a better nuance of the current one we live in. Bam, suddenly a lot less people hungry in Africa for example. As said, there's enough for everyone, distribution is the problem because many there don't have anything of value which would give them the option to acquire things others have. And no one is going to give them enough of resources for free. Because that's just plain crazy and no one's wallet will get thicker that way.
Hm.. Then again, it's not really the money itself that's the problem, is it. There's still the factor of some people just wanting to have more than others. Taking money out of the problem wouldn't change all that much if I think about it. Someone would just take things (i.e. food) from someone just so they can have more and someone gets a piece of starvation in return. Well, this is a dead end.
Greed has been around since the dawn of man really. And I'm pretty sure they didn't have some top dollar to pay all those thousands of years ago either. Someone may say that even dinosaurs were greedy and killed a lot just so others couldn't get it. Sure, natural selection and all, but that's not exactly greed now, is it? They were driven by instincts and didn't know better because thinking was too new for that time. They just want to make more of on breed and those who had resources, had the opportunity to do so while others died out. Then they got wiped out and it was all for nothing anyway. Pity.
| No, because they don't always know how to spell intelligent |
But here we have people. Intelligent homo sapiens who know so much, understand so much and have learnt so many things no one ever imagined before. Still learning, expanding and making more of ourselves. Well, some more than others. So here's the question. If we're so smart and whatnot, why do we have to make things difficult for us. If we're so smart, why don't we simply fix things that are broken. Things that really need fixing and could most likely be fixed in a long term, given enough initiative.
I say again there's (still) enough for everyone and no one has to be without anything. Greed was inherited though evolution of man and those primal instincts are still present and always will be. But as intelligent human beings, we should also know better. I mean everybody, no exception. We're on this same damn boat together and if (I dare not say when) it stats sinking, we'll be in a great bit of trouble. Everyone would be the captain and we'd all go down with the ship.
Dinosaurs didn't think, they just reacted. We can think and react properly, not based on instinct. I think it would be about time for everyone to start practicing that. I realise it's not going to happen and it's wishful thinking, but the idea behind it seems nice.
I know I started writing about money and I got quite a bit off track. In the end it's just a matter of who has more and who has less. "I have more valuable paper than you, therefore I am better than you in everything," is what many believe in and it's sad. Sad but such is reality. No one picks which life will they be born in. Those who are hungry, cold and abandoned were just dealt very shitty cards when they were born. Same goes for their parents and so forth. At least I'm not aware of cases where someone from wealthy parents is born into a life of misery and poverty. The other way around is even less likely (maybe when they're using them as rent-a-womb service).
I can't complain too much if I'm honest, just being able to write this thing shows that I have a lot more than many have and should not say a thing. At the end of the day, we just have to comply with the situation we're in and if there's an opportunity to take a leap for the better, just take it. It just requires other factors to do so first.
Now why don't you just...
| As if I have any! |
- Gi